FBI Report Confirms Truth Regarding Computer Server Activity, President Trump’s Integrity Proven
Ever since the Democratic National Committee’s server was hacked in the summer, there have been rumors swirling about the people responsible. Almost instantly, the Democrats started blaming Russia for hacking their servers. After that commotion died down, yet another hack on the Democrats revived the Russian hacking theory.
Except this time, the Democrats started roping then-President-elect Donald Trump into their conversations. They started saying that Trump was collaborating with the Russians in order to secure the election, to which he has adamantly denied.
These are harsh claims, and would normally require evidence to back up, which the Democrats have not produced. To this very day, the Democrats still insist that there is a Russian connection with Trump. However new evidence has come forward that should squash that narrative completely.
They’re not going to find evidence for it, because it doesn’t exist! According to a report from Circa, United States officials have conducted a months-long FBI counterintelligence investigation into supposed Russian attempts to twist the United States election.
In something that is going to shock the Democrats to their very core, this investigation didn’t bring up enough evidence to charge anyone criminally. In other words, that Russian hacking narrative has been proven false.
Circa also reported that the agents who were responsible for the investigation didn’t find anything incriminating. They looked at then President-elect-Trump’s business in New York’s Trump Tower. After going through it, they found no disreputable contacts, financial transactions or even encrypted communications occurred with the Russians.
The Democrats, along with help from the media, have been talking about a supposed connection for months now. It has been extremely frustrating to the people involved with the intelligence community.
One source that was directly involved with the situation spoke about these frustrations. “We have people spouting off who don’t know the difference between FISA surveillance and a wiretap or a counterintelligence probe versus a special prosecutor criminal case, and it has hurt our ability to get to the truth and has wrongly created the impression that intelligence officials have a political agenda.”
The report states that numerous sources claimed the FBI wanted to look into the supposed Russian connection in the 2016 election because of the past. Russia has spied on the United States before. So Democrats can’t say that Russia was getting investigated because they kept complaining about it.
However, the most important part of Circa’s report has to deal the fact that Americans are regularly intercepted when the FBI is monitoring foreign individuals, just like Russian embassy officials. In other words, the then-soon-to be National Security Adviser General Michael Flynn was intercepted during his conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States.
According to sources, a warrant wasn’t necessary to review the conversations that took place because it was a national security matter. It’s also important to note that Flynn had a security clearance in the matter as well.
As most are aware of, Flynn was forced to resign when the Democrats and the media became aware that he communicated with a Russian ambassador. However, these communications, in the form of calls and text messages, were basically holiday wishes. Flynn also expressed his condolences for some tragedies that were happening in Russia at the time.
There was one other conversation, through text messages about talking on the phone, which was about sanctions imposed on Russia by the Obama administration in late December. However that conversation was not incriminating like the media and the Democrats wanted the public to think.
Circa had the answer. They reported, “But the message the American official gave was mostly that a new sheriff was about to take over the White House and Russians shouldn’t react to the new sanctions in a way that would foreclose better dialog in the future under a Trump administration, sources said.”
Considering that Flynn’s name was leaked, the biggest question remains this: Who was responsible for giving Flynn’s name to the media? These leaks began in January after President Barack Obama had changed one executive order. This order allowed information taken from FISA warrants, or from the National Security Agency to be given out to 16 other federal agencies.
This sensitive information is usually only given to eight top leaders in Congress. These are people who are regularly briefed by the intelligence community about classified information. However, after President Obama changed the executive order, it allowed a tremendous number of staff throughout the entire government to gain access to the information.
While the Democrats continue to slam Trump for mere rumors of working with Russia, one of their top lobbyists was actually paid to work on behalf of them! John Podesta’s brother, Tony Podesta, was paid $170,000 from a Russian bank to speak to President Obama about sanctions placed on the nation. Unlike the Trump-Russian connection, this connection between Podesta and Russia is 100 percent confirmed.
On top of that, Russia and Trump are not as close as the Democrats or the media portray. As it turns out, there might be some Russian weapons hidden in the bottom of the ocean right off of the coast of the United States. If Russia were as friendly with Trump as the media and Democrats say they are, then why are there weapons down there?
Share this article to show that, just as Trump has been saying all along, there is no evidence against Trump for alleged Russian hacking in the election. Now that there is finally a report showing that there isn’t proof, the Democrats should stop pushing that agenda. However, they don’t like to listen to facts, so they will continue to push that claim.